The Dark Half a Middling 90s Stephen King Adaptation

Advertisements

A handful of Stephen King adaptations from the 1990s are quite good – The Shawshank Redemption and Misery remains classics. Despite its lack of impact, Needful Things is also much better than its reputation suggests. Not surprisingly, there’s a few dreadful cinematic works based on King’s work from the flannel decade. Graveyard Shift, The Lawnmower Man, and Sleepwalkers – we’re looking at you. But there were also some middling results. Following the outing of his own pseudonym Richard Bachman, King wrote the successful The Dark Half. Just a few years later, George A. Romero adapted the novel into proved to be a pretty lackluster effort both critically and at the box office.

Synopsis

Author Thad Beaumont’s works have always been a little too highbrow to sell many copies. But the seedy, violent novels Beaumont writes under his pseudonym, George Stark, are crowd pleasers. When someone tries to extort Beaumont in exchange for keeping his secret, Thad sees it as an opportunity to finally ditch his alter-ego. He even goes so far as to stage a mock funeral for Stark. Yet somehow George Stark become a living and breathing physical entity intent on revenge against the man who purged him.

The Dark Half Can’t Quite Invest Its Premise With Genuine Scares

At the heart of Stephen King’s novel – and George A. Romero’s adaptation – is an intriguing hook. On one hand, Romero teases out what is a mostly compelling psychological study of the character, Thad Beaumont. Much of what works in The Dark Half is Beaumont’s exploration of how George Stark wasn’t just a fictional creation. That is, Romero delves into how each of us hides a dark side that creeps out in unexpected ways. For Thad Beaumont, George Stark and his nasty works allowed the more cerebral writer to express dark urges he may be comfortable acknowledging as his own. King’s idea of that dark side inevitably taking a physical form should be the perfect fuel for a horror movie.

At just over two hours, The Dark Half feels sluggishly paced, which is exacerbated by the lack of of atmosphere.

Nevertheless, Romero can’t translate the premise into a genuinely scary movie. At just over two hours, The Dark Half feels sluggishly paced, which is exacerbated by the lack of of atmosphere. While there’s sporadic spread out over this runtime, The Dark Half isn’t a consistently scary horror movie either. In particular, a finale with such personal stakes should feel tense, but Romero just isn’t able to invest any urgency into the scene. Moreover, the thriller’s attempt to honor King’s use of sparrows exceeds the grasp of the available effects. And in spite of his history pushing boundaries, Romero doesn’t push the envelope nearly enough even though we’re repeatedly told George Stark ‘isn’t a very nice guy’.

The Dark Half Finds Timothy Hutton Enjoying His Own Dark Half

Yes, there’s an interesting idea behind The Dark Half’s narrative. However, the mechanics of the premise are left woefully underdeveloped. Neither King’s novel nor Romero’s screenplay articulate much of a reason as to how Thad’s excised fraternal twin later becomes the physical embodiment of the fictional George Stark. There’s Julie Harris’ (The Haunting) playing a college colleague of Thad whose sole purpose in the movies is to at least try and offer some expository dialogue. To say it’s an underwhelming explanation would be an understatement. In addition, clunky dialogue just makes the problem worse. King’s dialogue works well on the written page, but it rarely translates well to the big screen. And Romero leaves most of that dialogue intact.

Maybe Hutton was chomping at the bit to play against type because he’s clearly having a blast playing George Stark.

Arguably, Timothy Hutton’s (The Temp) performance proves to be the thriller’s highlight. Anyone familiar with Hutton’s work won’t be surprised at how well he embodies the earnest Thad Beaumont. Maybe Hutton was chomping at the bit to play against type because he’s clearly having a blast playing George Stark. Watching Hutton’s polar opposite characters play off of one another gives The Dark Half its best moments. As the local town sheriff, Michael Rooker (The Walking Dead, Fantasy Island, Brightburn) also plays against type in what’s an oddly subdued role. Too bad Amy Madigan (The Hunt) has little to do for most of the movie.

The Dark Half Wastes An Interesting Premise on Bland Thrills

Who would have thought that the combination of George A. Romero and Stephen King could result in such a forgettable horror movie. Certainly, The Dark Half boasts a unique premise – and one that would have been deeply personal to King himself. Moreover, Timothy Hutton acquits himself quite well in a dual role, particularly as the wicked George Stark. But that’s where the positives come to an end. Romero fails to generate much atmosphere or suspense. And there’s a lack of scares alongside a story that’s too vague on details. Though we’re told George Stark ‘isn’t a nice guy’ – and he does his share of killing – he’s rather tame as compared to what you’ll find in other movies.

THE FINAL VERDICT: LEAVE IT IN THE 90S

King of Horror: Picking Past Film Adaptations of Stephen King’s Work to Remake

Advertisements

It’s ‘Master of Horror’ Stephen King’s 71st birthday today. His first novel, Carrie, was published in 1973. His works include Misery, The Shining, The Dark Tower series, and It. To date, King has published over 50 novels and collected works. One could easily make the argument that Stephen King is one of the most influential authors of the last 50 years or so. I remember reading my first Stephen King novel in Grade Six, and I haven’t stopped.

Not surprisingly, many of King’s novels have been adapted into feature-length films or made-for-television movies. King’s accomplishments in horror literature are giant, but the success of adapting his work to the big screen has met with mixed results. The Shining, Carrie, and Misery are rightly considered horror classics. Other movies like Maximum Overdrive or Graveyard Shift are critically reviled.

Now with King’s work experiencing a renaissance in Hollywood there’s talk about re-visiting otherpast adaptations. We’ve already witnessed Carrie and It get the remake treatment with Pet Sematary coming down the pipe. For this edition of The Chopping Block, I celebrate Stephen King’s birthday by proposing a list of film adaptions that I think would benefit from the remake treatment.

Stephen King’s The Stand

To date, The Stand remains my personal favourite among Stephen King’s work. It’s a massive story in terms of scope and characters that would understandably be a challenge to adapt into a movie. Now I’ll put this right out there for readers – I am not a fan of the original made-for-television version of It. Tim Curry’s performance as Pennywise the Clown is terrifying, but the rest of the movie felt flat to me.

If you’re old enough you’ll know what I mean when I say, a “made-for-television” movie. These were movies usually produced by one of the major television networks for broadcasting during primetime TV hours. Typically, these movies had much smaller production values and starred recognizable TV or character actors.

When The Stand got the made-for-television treatment in 1994 it was well received and largely success. Yet in many ways, The Stand mini-series suffers from the same problem as the 1990 version of It. Key characters are woefully miscast with performers clearly in over their heads. While the expanded television format allowed director Mick Garris to keep much of the story intact, the budget limitations restrained much of the novel’s epic scope. In addition, The Stand watered down a lot of the novel’s content to meet primetime television standards.

Imagine a two to three season mini-series produced by Netflix or Amazon. A creative filmmaker wouldn’t be as handcuffed in what could or couldn’t be shown. Audiences have also proven to be much more patient in allowing creators to take their time exploring narratives. People are getting tired with The Walking Dead, so forget zombies and give us more Randall Flagg.

The Dark Tower

The less said about last year’s cinematic adaptation of The Dark Tower, the better. Wasting Idris Elba should be a crime. My problems with The Dark Tower adaptation are similar to my issues with the 1994 version of The Stand. We’re talking about not just one epic novel but a series of books. In The Dark Tower series, Stephen King has woven a very complex mythology that almost defies a cinematic adaption. But the same could also have been said about Game of Thrones. What could the right creative team do with The Dark Tower novels if they went to HBO and got a proper budget? This is a no-brainer – The Dark Tower deserves another chance to shine on screen.

Christine

John Carpenter and Stephen King, together. How could it not be an amazing horror film? Don’t get me wrong, Christine is not a bad film. Yet it’s definitely one of horror master John Carpenter’s more middling-efforts. It’s also not necessarily one of the better adaptations of King’s work. Christine features an emotional and heartbreaking character arc. It’s equal parts horror and coming-of-agestory about childhood friendships fading as we become adults.

Carpenter gets much of the horror right in his film. Christine also boasts a very underrated film score. Nevertheless, Carpenter doesn’t quite capture the more nuanced emotional core of King’s novel. In addition, he makes an odd choice to revise the origins of Christine’s evil in the film. This revision to the source material really reduces the emotional impact of Arnie’s character arc. There is a much better version of Christine just begging to be filmed, the shitter’s be damned.

The Dark Half

George A. Romero is another master of horror. But The Dark Half is not peak Romero by any stretch of the imagination. Like Christine, The Dark Half is not a bad movie. Sadly, it’s just underwhelming and very forgettable. To be fair, it’s not all Romero’s fault. Stephen King’s psychological horror novel about an author with a murderous pen name makes for a fascinating read. But it’s complex concept to translate from text to screen. To his credit, Romero illustrates a pretty sharp understanding of King’s dark psychology. In what turns out to be quite a surprise, Romero actually struggled with the supernatural and horror elements of the source material. Timothy Hutton is also miscast in The Dark Half, which didn’t help.

The Running Man

Yes, fans of ’80’s action films may take offence to this recommendation. I love Arnold Schwarzenegger films just as much as the next person. But the 1987 adaptation of The Running Man liberally borrows the title and premise from the Richard Bachman novel and not much else. In fact, The Running Man is the perfect example of why remakes aren’t always a bad idea.

The Running Man was years ahead of its time. Published a decade before Survivor and Big Brother became fixtures in primetime television, Stephen King’s novel seems almost eerily prescient now. Good popular culture ages well; it’s relevancy does not dwindle. King’s novel about a fascist government state using media to control and pacify its own people is more relevant now than ever before. Of course, the novel’s original ending would have to be altered. Nonetheless, the right filmmaker could adapt King’s source material and deliver a wickedly subversive thriller.