Body Snatchers: They Get You When You Sleep

Advertisements

When Jack Finney published his 1955 novel, The Body Snatchers, it touched a nerve. At the height of the McCarthy-era Communist witch-hunt, Finney’s story of emotionless aliens posing as family, friends, and neighbours was a powerful political allegory. Since its publication The Body Snatchers has inspired several film adaptations. Most critics consider Don Siegel’s 1956 Invasion of the Body Snatchers, along with Philip Kaufman’s 1978 remake, to be classics. And Robert Rodriguez’s The Faculty is a hip, albeit loose, update on the concept. The less said about 2007’s The Invasion, the better. But horror and sci-fi fans often forget about Abel Ferrara’s 1993 remake. Despite its limited theatrical release, Body Snatchers does Finney’s premise justice.

Synopsis

Marti Malone could have imagined a better way to spend her summer. Instead of parties and friends, Marti is stuck with her father, stepmother, and a half-brother at a military base. Her father, Steven, an agent with the Environmental Protection Agency, is inspecting the base’s impact on the surrounding environment. But the Malone’s find something much worse than chemical waste. First, a panicked soldier warns Marti that “they get you when they sleep”. Marti then notices that people are acting strangely. And her stepbrother believes his mother is someone else. Soon an alien threat plunges the base chaos and paranoia.

Body Snatchers Finds New Paranoia, Scares, and Tension From Familiar Concept

As a filmmaker, Ferrara deserves a lot of credit for his work here on Body Snatchers. Watch Ms 45 or The Driller Killer and you’ll appreciate Ferrara’s range. As compared to those exploitation flicks, Ferrara exhibits a lot of restraint in Body Snatchers. At just under 90 minutes, the sci-fi thriller is leaner than its 1978 counterpart. Ferrara wastes little time kicking the story into motion. Though the 1993 remake sacrifices some atmosphere and tension, Body Snatchers still captures a sense of urgency. This version can’t avoid comparisons to the prior adaptations, but Ferrara finds new ways to create paranoia and tension from the familiar material. Along the way, decent effects, some nice nice references to past versions, and a few good scares elevate things from straight-to-video fare.

But Meg Tilly makes the biggest impression …. [she] delivers the movie’s most bleak and chilling dialogue.

To some extent, Body Snatchers wastes a good cast. First, Ferrara casts R Lee Ermey as – you guessed it – the military base general. A talented character actor noted for the intensity he brought to his roles, Ermey (The Texas Chainsaw Massacre) has little to do in the movie. And there’s something criminally wrong with putting Ermey in a role where he’s tasked with not showing emotion. Likewise, Body Snatchers under-utilizes Forest Whitaker who jumps into full paranoia, largely off-screen. One gets the impression that Ferrara left some scenes on the cutting room floor. Both Terry Kinney and Gabrielle Anwar are perfectly fine as father and daughter. But Meg Tilly makes the biggest impression. In addition to her Donald Sutherland homage, Tilly delivers the movie’s most bleak and chilling dialogue.

Ferrara Crafts a Smart, Albeit, Underdeveloped Social Commentary for its Era

Prior to Body Snatchers, some audiences knew Ferrara from his neo-noir crime thrillers (King of New York). Others may have seen his earlier controversial exploitation fare (The Driller Killer). Body Snatchers was the filmmaker’s first foray into science fiction. And Ferrara adapts well to the switch in genres. Of course, Finney released his source novel right in the middle of McCarthyism and the ‘Red Scare’. In that setting, The Body Snatchers was a politically-loaded story. Over 20 years later, Kaufman adapted the story for the political paranoia of 1970’s America.

The military-industrial complex was alive and well in the 1980’s. As such, Ferrara’s decision to set his update on a military base makes sense.

Similarly, Ferrara attempted to channel Finney’s premise into a socially relevant story for the 1990’s. At the time of its release, Body Snatchers was only several years removed from the Reagan presidency. Among other things, Reagan increased military spending and sped up the American buildup in the arms race. The military-industrial complex was alive and well in the 1980’s. As such, Ferrara’s decision to set his update on a military base makes sense. Specifically, Ferrara’s Body Snatchers draws comparisons between its ‘pods people’ and the rigid conformity of military culture. It’s a clever, if not perfectly, executed concept. With its lean runtime and added family drama, Body Snatchers can’t fully flesh things out.

Body Snatchers a Hidden Gem of 90’s Horror

For whatever reason, Warner Brothers barely let Body Snatchers see the light of day in theaters. As a result, Ferrara’s sci-fi remake languished in straight-to-video hell, falling under many horror fans’ radars. Though it falls short of the classic 1978 Invasion of the Body Snatchers, Body Snatchers is a surprisingly strong, economic thriller. The movie runs lean, squeezes out quite a bit of tension from familiar scenarios, and honours the concept’s subtext. Moreover, Ferrara’s nods to both prior film versions aren’t distracting. And Meg Tilly’s creepy turn gives some new life to an iconic image. Like Tom Savini’s 1990 Night of the Living Dead remake, Ferrara’s Body Snatchers was an unfairly ignored 90’s horror movie worth re-visiting.

FINAL VERDICT: WORTH RE-VISITING

Bad Moon: A 90’s Horror Movie with Just Enough Bite

Advertisements

In the early 1980’s, the werewolf enjoyed a brief renaissance in horror. While zombies and vampires have enjoyed renewed peaks of popularity in the 2000’s, the lycanthrope hasn’t fared as well. Outside of some well made indie efforts, big screen werewolf adaptations, including Wes Craven’s Cursed and The Wolf Man remake, flopped. Back in 1995, Eric Red’s Bad Moon came and went with little fanfare. One look at its cover artwork and no one would blame you if you thought it came out in the 80’s. But as home video companies like Shout Factory now make their way through 90’s libraries, Bad Moon has a chance to get a second look from horror fans.

Synopsis

During a work trip in Nepal, photojournalist Ted Harrison fights off a vicious attack by a werewolf. Though he survives, Harrison is now afflicted with the curse of the lycanthrope. After several failed attempts to find a cure, Harrison returns home to visit his sister and her young son, hoping to find some peace with family. But his curse increasingly puts his family at risk as he slowly loses control over his urges. Now only the family dog, Thor, stands between Uncle Ted and his family.

Bad Moon’s Werewolf Effects Mostly Hold Up

Make-up artist Jack Pierce put the werewolf on the map with his work in The Wolf Man. Horror fans waited forty years for Rick Baker and Rob Bottin to revolutionize The Wolf Man’s effect in An American Werewolf in London and The Howling, respectively. Let’s face it – if you’re making a werewolf movie, you need a convincing werewolf. And for the most part, Bad Moon impresses with its practical effects. Contrary to expectation, director Eric Red doesn’t hide his monster in shadows either. Straight out of the gate, Red gives audiences a good glimpse of his werewolf. While the effects have aged a little, and one transformation scene shows more than it can convincingly pull off, Bad Moon’s ‘wolf man’ impresses.

And for the most part, Bad Moon impresses with its practical effects.

Arguably, Bad Moon’s biggest test comes in its big final act. Like 80’s Stephen King adaptation, Silver Bullet, Red brings his werewolf out of the shadows into a fully lit room. Though Silver Bullet suffered for it, Bad Moon fares much better. The practical animatronic effects don’t pull you out of the moment – they hold up to scrutiny. It helps that Red shocks with a bit more of a harder edge to his werewolf violence. Good editing and make-up effects make the movie’s lycan kills stand out. Overall, Bad Moon’s werewolf scenes make it a much better than expected horror movie.

Stiff Performances and Unconvincing Family Melodrama

If Silver Bullet dates itself with underwhelming werewolf effects, it benefits from good performances and touching character dynamics. Conversely, Bad Moon feels lopsided when the sun comes up and its werewolf hibernates. Over the course of her career, Mariel Hemingway delivered some memorable performances. Unfortunately, Bad Moon doesn’t feature one of those performances. By and large, Hemingway looks bored in the movie. Veteran Michael Paré puts a little more into his character, but it’s a stiff performance that often underwhelms. Of course, Bad Moon burdens Paré with an uneven characters and some of the movie’s sillier moments. At times, it’s hard to decide if Paré’s ‘Uncle Ted’ is a ‘tragic victim’ or just a ‘monster’. And when Paré marks his territory to one up the family dog, it comes off as a forced introduction of humour to the movie.

Bad Moon occasionally feels like it missed something in translation.

Aside from uneven performances, Bad Moon’s family dramatics never feel compelling. Red adapted the movie from Wayne Smith’s novel, Thor. Apparently, Smith’s novel more prominently examines Uncle Ted’s visit from family dog Thor’s perspective. When Bad Moon focuses on the protective family dog, it’s a much more interesting movie. While I wouldn’t quite describe it as tension, these scenes do give the movie a quiet mood unlike other werewolf movies. And Thor the dog is a much more sympathetic character than his human counterparts. Certainly, Bad Moon occasionally feels like it missed something in translation.

Bad Moon An Uneven But Still Better-Than-Expected Werewolf Movie

Bad Moon feels like two different movies in one. As a werewolf movie, Bad Moon delivers some surprisingly grisly deaths with good practical effects. Though it’s not necessarily scary, the movie hits enough of the expected sub-genre notes to engage for most of its runtime. On the flip side, Bad Moon tries to add a compelling family drama that’s unconvincing and feels disconnected from the movie’s better parts. In spite of these weaknesses, Eric Red keeps his movie chugging along at a good pace. Don’t expect The Howling, An American Werewolf in London or, say, Dog Soldiers. But Bad Moon deserved better than its original fate.

FINAL VERDICT: BAD MOON DESERVES A LOOK

Man’s Best Friend Barks Up The Wrong Tree

Advertisements

I’ve said it several times in other posts, but will repeat it again. In contrast to the 1970’s and 1980’s, the 90’s was a relatively disappointing period for horror. Certainly, several horror classics were released in the decade of flannel. Candyman, Jacob’s Ladder, In The Mouth of Madness – just to name a few examples. Before Wes Craven re-invigorated the genre with Scream, Hollywood studios contentedly offered middle-of-the-road fare for cineplexes. Among these forgettable flicks was 1993’s ‘killer dog’ movie, Man’s Best Friend. Stephen King made dogs scary in Cujo – could this 90’s upgrade add some bite to the same concept?

Synopsis

Small-time journalist Lori Tanner’s latest story leads her to EMAX laboratories. The facility and its scientist, Dr. Jarrett, are rumoured to be conducting unethical genetic experiments with animals. Desperate for a big break, Tanner breaks into the laboratory and inadvertently frees ‘Max’, a large Tibetan Mastiff. After Max saves Lori from a mugger, she decides to take the dog home. But unbeknownst to Lori, Max is a deadly and unstable genetic hybrid. With Dr. Jarrett tracking her down and Max ticking like a time-bomb, Lori quickly discovers that has put herself and her loved ones in grave danger.

Man’s Best Friend is All Bark, No Bite

New Line Cinema probably thought they had another Cujo on their hands. Instead ‘The House That Freddy Built’ got an Rated-R Air Bud. Simply put, Man’s Best Friend lacks scares and suspense. On the one hand, director John Lafia (Child’s Play 2) didn’t make a boring movie. At just under 90 minutes, Man’s Best Friend clips along at a decent pace. Just enough happens on screen to keep your interest. And Lafia is a competent, if not workmanlike, filmmaker. On top of these small favours, the movie looks good.

Horror fans won’t even find a decent or contrived jump scare.

Yet in spite of the movie’s production values, Man’s Best Friend just isn’t scary. Horror fans won’t even find a decent or contrived jump scare. Cujo wringed out a surprising amount of tension from its simple premise and limited setting. You may not be bored watching Man’s Best Friend, but you won’t be watching with one eye closed either. The lack of chills is even more problematic considering that Lafia’s movie takes itself very seriously. Perhaps if Man’s Best Friend had opted for intentional camp, it might have proven more memorable.

Not scary…

Decent Special Effects and Lance Henriksen Not Enough

Arguably, the big winner of Man’s Best Friend is Kevin Yagher’s makeup effects. Let’s face it, ‘Killer Animal’ movies are a mixed breed. No pun intended. Audiences can only suspend their belief so much. Sooner or later, the movie needs to show its ‘beast’ in action. For every Jaws or Cujo, there’s a Grizzly or Tentacles that fails to convincingly unleash its natural horror. Fortunately, Yagher’s practical make-up effects largely work. Watch for a stand-out scene where ‘Max’ swallows a cat whole like an anaconda. It’s too bad that the movie didn’t include more of this type of over-the-top horror fun.

…Henriksen does what he can with the silly material.

For what’s essentially a slick-looking B-movie, Man’s Best Friend has a decent cast. Former ‘Brat Packer’ Ally Sheedy headlines the movie, but horror fans will stay for genre favourite, Lance Henriksen. Though he’s not nearly in the movie enough, Henriksen does what he can with the silly material. As expected, he grimaces and shouts at the camera, playing it straight from start to finish. A lacklustre script ensures we also get some strange character choices, including a ridiculously stereotypical Italian police officer. In addition, there’s a couple of ‘comical’ dog-catchers that seem to think they’re in a very different movie.

Man’s Best Friend Forgettable ‘90’s Horror

If the ‘90’s had a horror problem, it was probably the tendency of major studios to play it too safe. After the boundary-pushing of the 1970’s and the gratuitous blood and nudity of the 1980’s, studios seems to settle for the generic. Not surprinstly then, Man’s Best Friend joined other 90s fare like Brainscan, feeling safe and pretty forgettable. It’s not a bad movie, but that’s not necessarily a ringing endorsement either. If you’re a die-hard collector and grew up in the 90’s, Shout Factory recently re-mastered Man’s Best Friend for Blu-ray. Everyone else can probably just take a pass.

FINAL VERDICT: LEAVE IT IN THE 90’S

Virus: Derivative Story-Telling … You Are Virus

Advertisements

Everyone has to start somewhere, right? Odds are that every big name actor or actress has one movie to their credit they’d wish away. George Clooney has Return to Horror High. Jennifer Aniston has Leprechaun. And Matthew McConaughey and Renee Zellweger have Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Next Generation. As one of horror’s favourite ‘Scream Queens’, Jamie Lee Curtis boasts an impressive scary movies résumé. But even Curtis has the odd genre misfire. In fact, she’s has gone on record, referring to this movie as a ‘piece of shit’. That movie is 1999 aquatic horror outing, Virus. But is Virus really that bad? Or has time lifted it to ‘so bad, it’s good’ status?

Synopsis

A salvage crew on the deep seas stumbles upon a seemingly abandoned Russian research vessel. Tempted by a big financial windfall, the crew begins picking apart the ship. But when a lone survivor stumbles out of hiding with stories of an electrical alien life form, the skeptical salvagers quickly learn that something is indeed lurking in the ship’s dark corridors. And it has decided that humanity is a virus that must be eliminated.

Virus a Mishmash of Ideas From Other (Better) Movies

No one expects every movie to re-invent the wheel. Sometimes a good, but familiar, premise can be re-fashioned in an exciting and fresh ways. And in many cases, familiar premises just get re-hashed like checking off boxes in a list. Sadly, in spite of an interesting setting, Virus falls into the latter category. From its basic story to the one-note characters, Virus anchors itself with uninspired story-telling. Once again we’re treated to a story of an alien or sentient technology unimpressed with humanity. Earlier in 1999, The Matrix pulled off the same idea with far more innovative story-telling. Even low-budget sci-fi grinder Hardware executed the same concept with more soul.

And in many cases, familiar premises just get re-hashed like checking off boxes in a list. Sadly, in spite of an interesting setting, Virus falls into the latter category.

Aside from its lifeless take on the concept, Virus takes a formulaic trip through its plot points. Pause the movie after 10 minutes and take a quick survey of the cast. In all likelihood, most viewers will know be able to pick out who dies and in what order. Yes, characters will foolishly venture into dark corridors alone. Despite the utter stupidity of it, one character will greedily conspire with the alien lifeforce to better themselves. And you’ll be able to pick out the character – it’s the one who talks a lot about money and ‘their cut’. Will anyone survive? Probably. If you’re not sure who, just look at who gets top-billing? The bigger question – will you care.

Decent Special Effects and Quick Pacing Keep Virus Afloat

In spite of all its cons, Virus still remains watchable. If it’s not quite a ‘guilty pleasure’, the movie has enough self-awareness to keep things moving quickly. Like a bubblegum pop song, Virus hits its cynically familiar beats and gets to where it needs to be with efficiency. There’s little to nothing in the way of suspense or scares, but the movie knows to not overstay its welcome. With respect to its special effects, Virus actually remains pretty impressive after over 20 years. The bio-mechanical ‘Frankenstein’s monsters’ actually hint at what could have been if a better screenplay existed. When you take in these effects with the movie’s brisk jaunt to the finish line, Virus avoids being a complete time-waster.

Jamie Lee Curtis Wishes She Had Booked a Ticket Out On The Terror Train

Somehow Virus assembled an impressive cast of stars and good character actors. In addition to Jamie Lee Curtis and Donald Sutherland, William Baldwin boards ship to play the movie’s chisel-jawed hero. And contrary to expectation, Baldwin turns in the movie’s best performance. Of course, it’s likely due to his largely playing the entire thing with a straight face and limited range. In contrast, Curtis looks absolutely bored with everything going on around her. She clearly knows the movie is a trainwreck and wishes she was back on 80’s slasher Terror Train.

“You are virus”.

Though he’s a talented actor with a laundry list of memorable roles, Sutherland is dreadful in Virus. The scenery-chewing toggle is turned to ‘maximum’, with Sutherland even evoking an inexplicable accent. Think Jon Voight in Anaconda. Some other ‘hey, it’s that guy’ actors chip in. Fans of Fear The Walking Dead will recognize Cliff Curtis (Doctor Sleep). Unbelievably, Virus is the Kiwi actor’s third aquatic horror movie, including The Meg and Deep Rising.

Virus a Dull, Derivative Effort Best Left in the ’90s

Virus isn’t so much a bad movie, while it’s certainly not a good one by any means. Instead, Virus is a dull, forgettable collection of ideas from much better movies. To its credit, the movie does move along at a quick enough pace to at least keep you watching. Not much, if anything, in the movie will intrigue or excite. Conversely, Virus is never ridiculously stupid enough to hit that sweet spot of ‘guilty pleasure’. The missile escape comes close; more scenes like this one would have helped. But Virus takes itself too seriously. As a result, it’s just another 90’s sci-fi horror best left in that decade.

THE FINAL VERDICT: JUST A BAD MOVIE

Graveyard Shift: A Minimum Wage 90’s Horror Movie

Advertisements

If Stephen King writes it, Hollywood will inevitably adapt it. Even some of King’s thinner works (no pun intended) have received the big-screen treatment. With so much output, it’s not really all that surprising that you get the occasional dud. Among these duds, Graveyard Shift remains one of the more forgotten King adaptations. The 1990 movie came and went from theatres without making much of a dent. Based on a short story, King included Graveyard Shift in his Night Shift collection. This is the same short story collection that gave us Children of the Corn, The Lawnmower Man, and Maximum Overdrive. Depending on your movie tastes, this is either a good or bad track record. Nearly 30 years later, has The Graveyard Shift aged well or does it still belong at the bottom of the dollar store bin?

Synopsis

Drifter John Hall arrives in a small Maine town and finds work in a run-down textile mill. Falling apart and overrun by rats, the mill’s cruel foreman, Warwick, assembles a clean-up crew for the ‘graveyard shift’. But as the workers, including Hall, make their way through the mill’s basement, they learn it’s overrun by something other than rats. Somewhere deep below the mill, an unseen monstrous creature is waiting for the graveyard shift.

Graveyard Shift A B-Movie That Doesn’t Know It’s a B-Movie

If you’re looking for horror with potent social commentary or moral complexity, Graveyard Shift isn’t that movie. This is horror movie about a giant mutated mix of a rat and bat. It’s a premise that wouldn’t have been out of place in the 1950’s. If the movie had opted to place its tongue firmly in cheek, we might have had a fun romp on our hands. Unfortunately, director Ralph S Singleton doesn’t seem to know what kind of movie he wants to make. As a result, Graveyard Shift is a tonally inconsistent movie.

A casket crushing poor Brad Dourif is far more interesting than most of the conversations between the movie’s characters.

Most of the time, it’s a goofy mix of over (and under) acting and cheap gore. Yet at other times, Graveyard Shift drags its feet with ill-conceived ambitions of being something more. There isn’t enough substance to the story to justify some scenes. Don’t expect Willard or even Of Unknown Origin – there’s no human character here compelling enough to slow things down. A casket crushing poor Brad Dourif is far more interesting than most of the conversations between the movie’s characters.

Graveyard Shift Surprises With Some Decent Monster Effects

Despite all of its faults, Graveyard Shift gets one thing right – the creature effects. Singleton plays it smart for most of the movie, keeping his mutated rat in the shadows. Even while Graveyard Shift is never a scary movie, Singleton shows enough of the monster to keep your interest. And the movie’s mutated rat impresses. The first time the monster wraps its wing around a victim it’s a truly impressive moment that belongs in a much better movie. One might expect to be disappointed with the movie’s big monster reveal. Obviously, Graveyard Shift is a modestly-budgeted 1990 movie – this isn’t an Alien movie. But the full mutant rat isn’t half bad. Maybe if Singleton had truly embraced the premise’s B-movie monster roots, things would have turned out a little better.

Dull Performances, Not Enough Brad Dourif

Any horror movie with Brad Dourif (Child’s Play, The Exorcist III) should be a lot more interesting. Unfortunately, Dourif’s ‘exterminator’ is only a supporting character whose screen time is criminally brief. Not surprisingly, however, Dourif still manages to deliver in a few scenes. Veteran character actor Stephen Macht admirably chews the scenery as the tyrannical plant owner, Warwick. Aside from the movie’s monstrous rat, Macht is the only major character who really occupies the screen. Future Wishmaster villain, Andrew Divoff also makes for a fun, sleazy supporting character.

…Andrews makes for a dull and completely uninteresting hero.

But Graveyared Shift badly miscasts David Andrews as the movie’s protagonist, drifter John Hall. In what can really only be labeled a wooden performance, Andrews makes for a dull and completely uninteresting hero. Love interest Kelly Wolf doesn’t fare much better. Neither actor demonstrates much charisma and there’s no chemistry between the characters. At least the rest of the cast rightly pegs Graveyard Shift for a B-movie and act accordingly.

Graveyard Shift Another Forgettable 90’s Horror Outing

Though several classic horror movies emerged in the 90’s, it wasn’t the genre’s best decade. Graveyard Shift joins a long list of average, forgettable 90’s horror movies. Too hackneyed to be serious, but not outrageous enough to be cult, Graveyard Shift is a watchable, below-average King adaptation. If we’re being perfectly honest, King’s original short story wasn’t exactly a goldmine for a great movie. But if Graveyard Shift had embraced the silliness of its premise and gone all-in with the gore, it might have made more of a lasting impression.

THE FINAL VERDICT: JUST A BAD MOVIE